Evers signs Wisconsin sports betting into law

Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers signed AB 601 on April 9, 2026, making the state the 33rd to legalize online sports betting under a tribal hub-and-spoke model.
Share on
Welcome to Wisconsin sign
  • Governor Tony Evers signed AB 601 into law on April 9, 2026, making Wisconsin the 33rd state to legalize online sports betting.
  • The law hands exclusive market control to the state’s 11 federally recognized tribes under a hub-and-spoke model, with launch expected months away.
  • The Sports Betting Alliance, which counts FanDuel and DraftKings among its members, has opposed the framework over a mandatory 60% tribal revenue share.

Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers signed AB 601 into law on April 9, 2026, legalizing online sports betting and making the state the 33rd to permit the practice.

The legislation passed the House by a voice vote in late February and cleared the Senate 21-12 on March 17, delivering what tribal advocates had sought for years. Exclusive market control goes to the state’s 11 federally recognized tribes.

Tribal model

Under the new law, online sports betting is permitted only if the infrastructure used to manage wagers, including computer servers, sits physically on tribal lands. That structure, known as the hub-and-spoke model, mirrors the system used by the Seminole Tribe in Florida under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

The state must now negotiate updated gaming compacts with all 11 tribes before any betting apps can go live. No timeline has been confirmed, and a 2026 launch looks ambitious given the complexity of those talks.

Evers had previously stated he would not sign unless all 11 tribes were aligned. A letter sent on April 8, 2026 from tribal leaders formally urged him to sign, confirming collective support.

Tony Evers, Governor of Wisconsin, said:

“The real work begins today. Each of the 11 Tribes must now work diligently — and together — to shape the future of sports betting in Wisconsin. An approach that exacerbates long-standing inequalities among Tribal Nations is not good for Wisconsinites or Wisconsin. I will not entertain it as governor.”

In 2024, Wisconsin tribes returned around $66 million to the state under existing compact revenue-sharing arrangements. Evers said the expansion creates an opportunity to channel new revenue toward mental health programs and efforts to combat the opioid crisis.

Operator concerns

The Sports Betting Alliance, which represents FanDuel, DraftKings, BetMGM, bet365 and Fanatics, has argued the model is not financially viable for commercial sportsbook operators. The central objection is a requirement to hand 60% of revenues to tribal partners.

A representative of the alliance said at a legislative hearing last November that “it’s simply not economically feasible for a commercial operator to hand over 60% just for the right to operate in the state.”

The alliance’s preferred outcome is a state constitutional amendment opening the market to all operators on equal terms. Without that change, the major national brands appear unlikely to pursue entry under the current framework.

Supporters of the bill include several Wisconsin tribes and the Milwaukee Brewers. Backers have argued that residents are already placing bets through offshore sportsbooks, prediction markets, or crossing into neighboring Illinois, where mobile wagering has been legal since 2020.

Across the US, state-regulated sportsbooks handled nearly $167 billion in wagers in 2024, generating close to $17 billion in revenue after payouts, according to the American Gaming Association. That represented a near 23% year-on-year increase.

What comes next

The road to a live Wisconsin market runs through compact negotiations that must satisfy Evers’ stated condition of equal benefit for every tribe. Evers leaves office in January 2027 and has been explicit that the legislation is a starting point, not a finished product.

For operators, the structure as signed offers limited entry points unless tribes choose to partner with commercial brands on terms both sides can accept. How those negotiations unfold, and whether any operator concludes the 60% revenue threshold is workable, will define a market that currently exists only in statute.


Keep reading


Submit story

Do you have a story worth sharing?
Send it over to our editors!

Send story
Advertise with us