MGC fines five operators $80,500 for violations

The Massachusetts Gaming Commission approved eight civil penalties totalling $80,500 against five licensed sports betting operators.
Share on
massachusetts gaming commission
  • The Massachusetts Gaming Commission approved eight civil penalties totalling $80,500 against five licensed sports betting operators.
  • Violations spanned illegal college player prop bets, a banned Heisman Trophy market, and wagers accepted on Russian UFC fighter Petr Yan.
  • All incidents were self-reported; commissioners noted improved compliance protocols across the industry.

The Massachusetts Gaming Commission (MGC) has levied eight civil administrative penalties against five licensed sports betting operators, totalling $80,500.

The fines were approved at the MGC Open Meeting on March 12, 2026, covering a range of noncompliance incidents dating back to the market’s early days.

BetMGM, DraftKings, and Fanatics Betting & Gaming each received two fines. Caesars Sportsbook and FanDuel each incurred one.

College bets and Petr Yan

Four of the eight violations involved illegal college player proposition bets. One additional penalty concerned wagers on the Heisman Trophy winner — also a prohibited market in Massachusetts.

Two further violations stemmed from operators accepting bets on UFC fighter Petr Yan, a Russian national. The MGC prohibits wagering on any athlete known to represent Russia or Belarus, a stance it shares with a small number of US regulators that moved early to restrict such markets.

Fanatics received the largest single penalty. The company was fined $20,000 for accepting 154 bets on Yan across a three-week period in July 2025, and a separate $7,500 for taking 36 Heisman Trophy futures bets between January and March 2025. Its combined total of $27,500 was the highest across all five operators.

BetMGM was penalised $15,000 for accepting bets on Yan across two separate timeframes, and a further $6,500 for a single $10 college player prop bet on a UNLV wide receiver in October 2024. Its total came to $21,500.

DraftKings was fined $10,000 for taking 89 player prop bets during an Arizona-Oregon college basketball game in March 2025, and $6,500 for accepting 13 props on a University of Michigan running back over a 24-hour window in January 2024.

Caesars Sportsbook received a $10,000 fine after accepting six bets totalling $8,270 on the number of cards shown during the 2024 UEFA Euro Tournament. Massachusetts bans wagering on officiating decisions.

FanDuel incurred the smallest penalty at $5,000 for accepting prop bets on a Nebraska quarterback’s passing yardage across two days in September 2023.

Self-reporting and remediation

In each case, operators either voided wagers placed ahead of the start of an event or compensated affected bettors to the commission’s satisfaction. All eight violations were self-reported, a factor the commission explicitly acknowledged in its deliberations.

Commissioner Nakisha Skinner said during the hearing:

“We, as a commission, come down pretty hard on the operators in these non-compliance matters where we need to — and with good reason. But the operators have stepped up their review of these matters and the protocol and remedial measures they have put in place to catch them.”

Skinner added that many incidents stemmed from human error, which she acknowledged is sometimes unavoidable. Commissioner Eileen O’Brien voted in favour of all eight fines but noted:

“I would go higher on most of these, but I understand the circumstances.”

Five of the eight violations occurred within the first two years of legal sports wagering going live in Massachusetts. Two took place within the market’s first year. The commission weighed that context in its penalty determinations. Massachusetts currently has seven licensed online sportsbooks in operation.

Compliance pressure continues

The MGC’s enforcement record shows a regulator with an expansive view of its obligations. The Russia and Belarus prohibition has now generated multiple enforcement actions, with the commission treating the rule as a hard market ban rather than a reporting obligation. The MGC’s approach to contested market questions has also been tested in the courts in recent months.

For licensed operators, this round of penalties reinforces that self-reporting and remediation carry weight with the commission, but do not eliminate financial exposure. Incidents from 2023 and 2024 remained firmly in scope, signalling that the MGC actively tracks historical noncompliance.

Operators yet to fully automate market eligibility checks, particularly around college sports and sanctioned-nation restrictions, face the greatest ongoing risk as enforcement activity shows no sign of slowing.


Keep reading


Submit story

Do you have a story worth sharing?
Send it over to our editors!

Send story
Advertise with us