Evolution-Black Cube legal standoff to hit crucial point on October 31
Table of contents
- New Jersey court gives Black Cube until October 31 to justify refusal to reveal its client
- Intelligence firm seeks dismissal under state anti-SLAPP laws at upcoming hearing
- Evolution maintains report was false, regulators previously cleared the company of violations
The legal confrontation between Evolution AB, Black Cube, and law firm Calcagni & Kanefsky is approaching a decisive moment as a New Jersey court set 31 October as the date for a crucial hearing.
The court will determine whether Black Cube must finally disclose the client who commissioned a 2021 report accusing the gaming supplier of breaching sanctions and operating in banned markets.
Black Cube given one week
The dispute began when the court ordered the Israeli intelligence firm to reveal the identity of the client within seven days. Black Cube then secured a temporary stay pending an October 31 Order to Show Cause hearing, where it will argue for dismissal under New Jersey’s anti-SLAPP laws designed to protect defendants from retaliatory lawsuits.
Judge John C. Porto, who issued the ruling, said regulators had already cleared Evolution of any wrongdoing following independent investigations.
“Viewed through the lens of the DGE’s findings, the Black Cube report is viewed as objectively baseless and no reasonable litigant could expect success on the merits,” he stated.
Evolution calls allegations false
The disputed report, coordinated by Calcagni & Kanefsky on behalf of an unnamed client, alleged Evolution’s games had been accessed from prohibited markets including Iran, Syria, and Sudan, operated in breach of US sanctions and New Jersey regulatory rules, and concealed the extent and locations of its illegal market activities from shareholders.
The claims led to a steep drop in Evolution’s market capitalisation in late 2021 before US and New Jersey regulators closed their probes without action.
Evolution has consistently rejected the accusations, calling them “false and defamatory”. The company argues that Black Cube’s refusal to name its client is part of an effort to shield a potential rival gaming supplier behind the damaging report.
October 31 hard deadline
The court’s interim order requires Black Cube to prepare payment records, invoices, and client communications linked to its 2021 investigation. If its motion to dismiss fails on October 31, the agency may be forced to unmask the client publicly.
Industry observers view the outcome as potentially precedent-setting for corporate intelligence work within gaming, where investigators are increasingly used in competitive disputes.
The forthcoming Halloween hearing could not only decide the case’s direction but also reshape how corporate secrecy and whistleblower-style reports are handled in the iGaming sector.
Do you have a story worth sharing?
Send it over to our editors!
